Director Roland Emmerich is usually a stickler for realism (see: sending a computer virus via Macintosh to aliens in Independence Day). So we hate to inform him that woolly mammoths were not, in fact, used to build pyramids. Heck, woolly mammoths weren't even found in the desert. They wouldn't need to be woolly if that were the case. And there weren't any pyramids in Egypt until 2,500 B.C or so.
Emperor Commodus was not the sniveling sister-obsessed creep portrayed in the movie. A violent alcoholic, sure, but not so whiny. He ruled ably for over a decade rather than ineptly for a couple months. He also didn't kill his father, Marcus Aurelius, who actually died of chickenpox. And instead of being killed in the gladiatorial arena, he was murdered in his bathtub.
Though this paean to ancient moral codes and modern physical training is based on the real Battle of Thermopylae, the film takes many stylistic liberties. The most obvious one being Persian king Xerxes was not an 8-foot-tall Cirque du Soleil reject. The Spartan council was made up of men over the age of 60, with no one as young as Theron (played by 37-year-old Dominic West). And the warriors of Sparta went into battle wearing bronze armor, not just leather Speedos.
The Japanese in the late 19th century did hire foreign advisers to modernize their army, but they were mostly French, not American. Ken Watanabe's character was based on the real Saigo Takamori who committed ritual suicide, or "seppuku," in defeat rather than in a volley of Gatling gun fire. Also, it's doubtful that a 40-something alcoholic Civil War vet, even one with great hair, would master the chopsticks much less the samurai sword.
This one movie has given entire Anthropology departments migraines. Sure the Maya did have the odd human sacrifice but not to Kulkulkan, the Sun God, and only high-ranking captives taken in battle were killed. The conquistadors arriving at the end of the film made for unlikely saviors: an estimated 90% of indigenous American population was killed by smallpox from their infected livestock.
The geisha coming-of-age, called "mizuage," was really more of a makeover, where she changed her hairstyle and clothes. It didn't involve her getting... intimate with a client. In the climactic scene where Sayuri wows Gion patrons with her dancing prowess, her routine - which involves some platform shoes, fake snow, and a strobe light - seems more like a Studio 54 drag show than anything in pre-war Kyoto.
Let's forget the fact that kilts weren't worn in Scotland until about 300 years after William Wallace's day and just do some simple math. According to the movie, Wallace's blue-eyed charm at the Battle of Falkirk was so overpowering, he seduced King Edward II's wife, Isabella of France, and the result of their affair was Edward III. But according to the history books, Isabella was three years old at the time of Falkirk, and Edward III was born seven years after Wallace died.
In 1585, when the movie takes place, Queen Elizabeth was 52 years old - Cate Blanchett was 36 when she shot the film - and was not being courted by suitors like Ivan the Terrible (who was dead by then). And though the movie has her rallying the troops at Tilbury astride a white steed in full armor with a sword, in fact she rode side saddle, carrying a baton. She was more of a regal majorette than Joan of Arc.
Revolutionary War figure Francis "The Swamp Fox" Marion was the basis for Mel Gibson's character, but he wasn't the forward-thinking family man they show in the flick. He was a slave owner who didn't get married (to his cousin) until after the war was over. Historians also say that he actively persecuted and murdered native Cherokees. Plus, the thrilling Battle of Guilford Court House where he vanquishes his British nemesis? In reality, the Americans lost that one.
According to this film, in year 2001 we would have had manned voyages to Jupiter, a battle of wits with a sentient computer, and a quantum leap in human evolution. Instead we got the Mir Space Station falling from the sky, Windows XP, and Freddy Got Fingered. Apparently the lesson here is that sometimes it's better when the movies get the facts all wrong.
credited to movies.yahoo.com











how about black hawk down?
Inglorious Basterds ringing any bells?
Almost any Western movie, for example:
"One of the most famous films based on the [Battle of Little Big Horn] incident was They Died with Their Boots On (1941), a highly fictionalized account of the battle with Custer portrayed by (Errol Flynn)."--Wikipedia
This one portrays Custer as a great hero.
what some of the people who missed the whole point of 300, is that it was a STORY told in such a manner to inspire the soldiers before the battle.
its really not fair to put 2001 into that list. the year it came out and many years on it was one of the most realistic scifi movies ever made, when it comes to spaceship technology. put 2012 in the list instead.
How about all the movies where the Americans single-handedly win WW2...such as 'U-571' where a crew of granite-jawed Americans capture the enigma machine...( it was actually the British ).
How about Master & Commander, Far Side of the World? Although there were some minor errors, essentially the movie was historically correct, based upon the Patrick O'Brien novels that were stories taken from British Naval Captains log books.
How about Master & Commander, Far Side of the World? Although there were some minor errors, essentially the movie was historically correct, based upon the Patrick O'Brien novels that were stories taken from British Naval Captains log books.
These are the reasons that movies are made, in order:
1. To make money
2. For art
3. To inform
If you wanted facts you'd watch a Documentary... which is reason 3.
Space odyssey 2001 is Science FICTION... Reason 2.
300 is adapted from the graphic novel by Frank Miller... Its FICTION... reason 2.
Apocalypto Never states where or when or how or who. It is FICTION... reason 2.
The Last Samurai has tom cruise in it... reason 1.
Now that you have this system you won't need to make posts about FICTIONAL movies being historically inaccurate
Inglorious basterds was a fiction movie...
How about John Wayne's the Alamo? there's about one inaccuracy per scene.
Actually, the mizuage used to be the bidding of a maiko's virginity in order to celebrate her coming of age, the practise was made illegal in 1959, and so it turned into ceremonially cutting the top knot of the hair.
Absolutely amazing. I had absolutely no idea that two of my favorite movies - Gladiator and Braveheart where so flawed. I need to rething my universe now :S
Apocalypto was written by Mel Gibson. He just wanted to show savages "saved" by the supposedly righteous Catholics.
Apocalypto
"The conquistadors arriving at the end of the film made for unlikely saviors: an estimated 90% of indigenous American population was killed by smallpox from their infected livestock."
n 1519 Hernán Cortés landed on the shores of what is now Mexico and was then the Aztec empire. In 1520 another group of Spanish arrived in Mexico from Hispaniola, bringing with them the smallpox which had already been ravaging that island for two years. When Cortés heard about the other group, he went and defeated them. In this contact, one of Cortés's men contracted the disease. When Cortés returned to Tenochtitlan, he brought the disease with him.